<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Study on Brighton's Blog</title><link>https://brightonxu.com/tags/study/</link><description>Recent content in Study on Brighton's Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-CN</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brightonxu.com/tags/study/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Personal CS Core-Course Review Tips</title><link>https://brightonxu.com/posts/en/2026-04-02-cs-exam-tips/</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://brightonxu.com/posts/en/2026-04-02-cs-exam-tips/</guid><description>&lt;div class="article-description" style="text-align: center; font-size: 1.3em; color: #555; margin: 20px 0 30px 0; font-weight: 500;"&gt;Some thoughts on an A+ in the Computer Networks resit&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cover photo taken on 2026.1.22&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the reason for CS finals to exist can&amp;rsquo;t be entirely denied, that doesn&amp;rsquo;t change the fact that core-course finals in CS have always been a widely maligned, spirit-grinding affair. For one thing, the final score doesn&amp;rsquo;t reliably reflect how deep a student&amp;rsquo;s understanding of the course actually is (that is&amp;hellip; deep learning); for another, the effort-to-reward ratio of a final can&amp;rsquo;t be guaranteed — plenty of the time you pour hours into review and still can&amp;rsquo;t pull a high score.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>